While arbitration, including arbitration awards, normally remain confidential, they become public when a disputing party asks a court to confirm or vacate the arbitration award. As today's NYTimes reports, the big arbitration award against Fox "spilled into public view on Wednesday after the plaintiffs in the case filed a petition to confirm the arbitration award in Los Angeles Superior Court.
The arbitrator, Peter D. Lichtman, said that Fox pocketed tens of millions of dollars that should have gone to the 'Bones' team. He ordered Fox to pay the plaintiffs $50 million in damages and an additional $128 million in punitive damages. Fox is contesting the $128 million ruling."
A blog about Arbitration law, by Stephen Ware, a law professor at KU, in Lawrence, Kansas.
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label confirming arbitration award. Show all posts
Showing posts with label confirming arbitration award. Show all posts
Thursday, February 28, 2019
Sunday, August 17, 2014
Arbitration of Trust Disputes, Telephonic Hearing, and Whether Arbitrator Exceeded Powers
All this in an interesting recent 8th Circuit case, Brown v. Brown-Thill.
Friday, July 25, 2014
Arbitration Award Based on Issue Preclusion (Collateral Estoppel) Enforced
A recent second circuit case confirmed an arbitrator's power to rule against a claim on the ground that of issue preclusion (collateral estoppel). Specifically, the arbitrator found an Administrative Law Judge had already resolved the relevant issue against the claimant. The case, American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO v. U.S. Postal Service, __F.3d__, 2014 WL 2535249 (2d Cir. June 6, 2014), is discussed here by Liz Kramer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)