I spoke on Arbitration Agreements in
Bankruptcy at the Missouri Bar Association’s Annual
Bankruptcy Institute in Springfield, MO, March 9, 2018,. The topic of arbitration
agreements in bankruptcy is addressed in my co-authored 2017 book, Principles
of Arbitration, and in a 2018 case by the United States Court of Appeals
for the Second Circuit in New York City, Anderson
v. Credit One Bank.
A blog about Arbitration law, by Stephen Ware, a law professor at KU, in Lawrence, Kansas.
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label bankruptcy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bankruptcy. Show all posts
Thursday, March 15, 2018
Thursday, January 2, 2014
Similarities between Arbitration and Bankruptcy Litigation
The litigation process in bankruptcy courts differs from the litigation process under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. And the bankruptcy litigation process differs from the Federal Rules in many of the same ways that the arbitration process tends to differ from the Federal Rules. This Article explores these similarities between the procedures of bankruptcy litigation and arbitration and contrasts them with the more elaborate procedures of ordinary civil litigation under the Federal Rules.
Nevada Law Review, Vol. 11, p. 436
Nevada Law Review, Vol. 11, p. 436
Sunday, December 15, 2013
Bankruptcy Law's Treatment of Creditors' Jury-Trial and Arbitration Rights
Bankruptcy Law's Treatment of Creditors' Jury-Trial and Arbitration Rights
This article starts with an apparent anomaly: Bankruptcy law treats the constitutional jury right with less deference than the, merely statutory, right to arbitrate.
This article explains that this apparent anomaly is actually the plausible result of a limitation within the Seventh Amendment jury right, its applicability only to claims at law but not claims in equity. The right to arbitrate is not similarly limited. So creditors seeking to arbitrate claims by and against debtors in bankruptcy are not defeated by longstanding holdings placing such claims on the equity side of the law/equity line. In contrast, creditors seeking jury trials of claims by and against debtors in bankruptcy are defeated by such holdings.
This article starts with an apparent anomaly: Bankruptcy law treats the constitutional jury right with less deference than the, merely statutory, right to arbitrate.
This article explains that this apparent anomaly is actually the plausible result of a limitation within the Seventh Amendment jury right, its applicability only to claims at law but not claims in equity. The right to arbitrate is not similarly limited. So creditors seeking to arbitrate claims by and against debtors in bankruptcy are not defeated by longstanding holdings placing such claims on the equity side of the law/equity line. In contrast, creditors seeking jury trials of claims by and against debtors in bankruptcy are defeated by such holdings.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)