The
U.S. Chamber of Commerce and others have said the [CFPB]’s findings do
not support its proposed rules. “By ignoring its own data that clearly
shows major deficiencies with court-based litigation and disregards the
real-world advantages of arbitration, the C.F.P.B. has demonstrated its
bias for trial lawyers over average Americans,” Mr. Webb, of the
chamber’s Institute for Legal Reform, said.
Considerable
sums of money are at stake. Late last month, the bond-rating firm
Moody’s Investors Service warned that if enacted, the bureau’s proposed
rule might leave companies more vulnerable to class actions that could
“force changes to company practices that cut into revenues” or “draw
regulatory scrutiny.”
Separately, the NY Times writes "the Justice Department issued a proposal to protect military service members from arbitration requirements. Earlier this month, Senator Al Franken, Democrat of Minnesota and a longtime opponent of arbitration, renewed his push for Congress to pass a bill he introduced this year that would prevent companies from requiring employees to go to arbitration."
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteReally I enjoy your site with effective and useful information. It is included very nice post with a lot of our resources.thanks for share. i enjoy this post. komora normobaryczna
ReplyDelete