Bellman v. i3Carbon, LLC, 2014 WL 2210739 (10th Cir. May 29, 2014), discussed by Liz Kramer
The court writes "Defendants argue that Plaintiffs manifested their acceptance of the
Operating Agreement, and specifically the arbitration provision, when they
invested in i3Carbon following receipt of the approximately 200-page
Investment Binder. However, the Operating Agreement included in the
Investment Binder did not have Plaintiffs’ names on it and did not indicate that
Plaintiffs were expected to sign it. Moreover, Plaintiffs have submitted
uncontroverted evidence that (1) i3Carbon never requested that they sign the
Operating Agreement or agree to its provisions, and (2) Plaintiffs, in fact, did
not sign the Operating Agreement."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.